Navigating The Complexity of Ownership From The Lens of Sanction By Extension
A Major Announcement Arrives in 2d 2h 44m
We offer parity pricing to make our services accessible beyond borders.
The KYB serves as the primary data source for verifying businesses and conducting corporate due diligence in over 250 countries and states.
Navigating the Complexity of ownership from the lens of Sanction by Extension
Mitigating Business verification complexity with The KYB in MENA Region
Onboard businesses with our swift KYB verification.
Expand globally without facing non-compliance challenges
Identify high-risk corporate clients while uncovering UBOs
Mitigate the risk of onboarding a shell company.
Partner with trusted companies and beneficial owners
Fortify your supply chain and ensure enhanced security
Mitigating Business Verification Complexity with The KYB in MENA Region
API Integration
We are excited to empower developers with all the information needed to utilize the full potential of our API. This comprehensive documentation serves as a guide to seamlessly integrate our API into applications, unlocking a world of possibilities.
KYB stands for Know Your Business, which is a due diligence process that companies use to verify the identity and legitimacy of their business partners or customers.
03 July, 2024
Political exposure is among the most widely used terms in the corporate and finance sector. The denomination primarily refers to individuals with a prominent position in the public sector and can be susceptible to financial crimes such as bribery. These persons are known as Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) and can be domestic or foreign individuals. Read more to discover who is a Foreign PEP.
A Foreign Politically Exposed Person (PEP) includes current and former leaders of state, other high-ranking officials of foreign governing bodies, members of their immediate families, and any businesses or other organizations owned by these individuals. According to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), a foreign PEP is someone who holds a high-ranking public office on behalf of a foreign government that is distinct from the government of the country where the bank is based. In fact, foreign PEPs include individuals like:
Even with prior experience in related positions, foreign PEPs should be categorized as high-risk because of their continued status as such. Risk assessment for Domestic PEPs is not influenced by factors such as their location of birth, residency, or citizenship. As a result, banks should be very careful when dealing with foreign PEPs since the risk is larger than with domestic PEPs. The only way for financial companies to reduce these risks is to monitor foreign PEPs closely. For this reason, it must be emphasized that PEPs from other countries pose a greater threat than PEPs that are domestic.
To better understand, evaluate, and control risks related to Foreign PEPs, the FATF has suggested that financial institutions implement Enhanced Due Diligence procedures and a thorough risk management framework. As part of this framework, the institution should establish rules and processes for handling the risks connected with foreign PEPs. If a client is suspected of being a Foreign PEP, the bank should have a reliable system to detect this.
Additionally, it is advised that financial institutions diligently monitor the accounts and transactions of foreign PEPs to keep the information collected current and relevant. In addition to conducting risk assessments on a regular basis, the institution must have well-defined protocols for reporting any suspicions or concerns about the customer’s behavior to the relevant authorities.
To help their employees better understand and mitigate the risks posed by Foreign PEPs, financial institutions should provide frequent training sessions. As part of this training, employees should learn the ins and outs of the company, how to comply with local laws, and how to spot warning signs of suspicious behavior.
To further assure compliance as well as risk reduction, financial entities should make evaluating their domestic and overseas clients’ PEP status a priority as part of their overall risk management structure.
Efforts to prevent money laundering and terrorist funding are regulated by both international and national rules, which control the identification and monitoring of Foreign PEPs. Here are a few important rules and directions:
When dealing with PEPs, financial institutions are required to use enhanced due diligence (EDD) steps, according to recommendations made by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an international body. The need for EDD on PEPs is expressly mentioned in Recommendation 12.
Anti-Money Laundering Directives 4 and 5 (AMLD4 and AMLD5) require member states to set up systems to track down and keep tabs on PEPs.
Part 312 of the USA Patriot Act mandates that financial institutions identify and evaluate risks related to foreign PEPs as part of their due diligence processes.
Latest Posts
28 June, 2024
Know Your Vendor: Helping Businesses Reevaluate Partnerships
27 June, 2024
Why Sanctions Screening Matters for Businesses in 2024?
25 June, 2024
What is Financial Crime Compliance? A Complete 2024 Guide
Recent Blogs