3 AML Experts Answer How to Verify Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) Amidst Its Challenges

Imagine a world where financial transactions flow freely, but the identities of those controlling the companies remain secret. In today’s interconnected world, where financial transactions crisscross the globe at lightning speed, ensuring transparency about who controls companies is more crucial than ever. But who are these ultimate masters, the elusive figures pulling the strings behind the scenes? We’re talking about Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs), and identifying them can be a frustrating maze for compliance teams. Inconsistent data, varying regulations across the globe, and internal process gaps can all turn a routine KYB check into a compliance nightmare.

The KYB assembled a team of industry experts to shed light on challenges associated with UBO verification and illustrate a way forward. Buckle up as we dive deep into UBO identification, corporate data risk, and sanction compliance. This in-depth article gives practical insights and actionable strategies from a thought-provoking session between Michael Harris, Financial Crime Risk Solutions Consultant at Neotas FCC Consulting with a proven track record of tackling financial crime, Mark Bain, The CEO of The KYB, who brings unparalleled expertise, and Louie Vargas, Founder and Co-Chair of ACFCS Nordics Chapter with over a decade of experience in financial crime landscape. Read this piece to conquer UBO challenges and safeguard your organization from financial crime risks!

Is UBO Screening A Challenge?

UBO screening and compliance are challenging milestones in achieving regulatory compliance. The problem lies in accurately identifying the ultimate beneficial owner, which can pose significant difficulties as we navigate global markets and encounter various sanction lists. Keep reading to discover more about the challenges presently existing in the domain of the business verification industry.

How Do Inconsistent Data Points across Jurisdictions Impact the KYB Compliance Efforts?

The issue lies in the need for a unified definition to establish a clear understanding of the requirements for both your organization and the jurisdictions where a business operates. These fundamental elements should be addressed at the outset. It may come as no surprise that different parts of the company may utilize the same KYB tool in varying ways. Therefore, it is essential to establish a level playing field to ensure comprehension of all gathered information and the utilization of the correct data fields.

This clarity in compliance makes work much easier, as we now know precisely what to focus on. When discussing different jurisdictions, the issue appears more prominent in the EU than in the US. In the US, a single law applies nationwide, whereas in the EU, there are multiple member states with differing understandings and interpretations of the law. This presents a challenge.

3 AML Experts Micheal Harris

Primary Challenges Associated with UBO Compliance:

During the extensive discussion in the webinar session, experts identified the following challenges many businesses face to ensure corporate transparency. Read out to determine the most prominent problems your company might face during the identification and screening of Ultimate Beneficial Owners:

  • Data Availability and Quality:

Most businesses and compliance professionals face significant challenges in accessing reliable and comprehensive data on Ultimate Beneficial Owners. The quality, completeness, and governance of available data in live registries are often insufficient for regulatory obligations.

  • KYB (Know Your Business) Obligations:

Institutions must gather extensive information to understand who they are doing business with. This is a fundamental part of AML (Anti-Money Laundering) regulations but is complex due to the sheer volume of data required, especially when onboarding businesses.

  • Complexity of Onboarding Businesses:

Onboarding a business involves collecting and verifying a substantial amount of information and documentation. This process is more intricate compared to onboarding individuals and requires a deeper understanding of the business operations and associated risks.

  • Risk Assessment:

Part of the compliance process involves assessing the risk of money laundering or terrorist financing associated with a business. This requires building a detailed picture of the business activities and determining the appropriate level of due diligence.

  • UBO Identification:

Identifying beneficial owners and the ultimate beneficial owner is a complex task. The difficulty is compounded by external factors such as incomplete data and varying standards of data governance across different jurisdictions.

  • Variability and Reliability of Public Registers:

 Although there have been efforts to improve public registers, they remain inconsistent globally. Some registers may not be complete or reliable, making it difficult for compliance professionals to depend on them for accurate Ultimate Beneficial Owner information.

  • Lack of Uniformity Across Jurisdictions:

Different jurisdictions have varying interpretations and implementations of AML regulations, leading to a lack of uniformity. This variability adds to the complexity of compliance, especially in regions like the EU, where multiple member states have different rules.

3 AML Experts - Louie Vargas

Way Forward to UBO Compliance:

In light of the aforementioned challenges, the prevailing question is, “How can we guarantee compliance with UBO regulations and overcome these obstacles? Is there a path forward?” The resounding answer is yes! But how, you ask? Our experts have meticulously assessed the following solutions:

  • Utilizing Data Providers:

Leveraging data providers to source necessary information is critical. These providers can offer access to comprehensive datasets that help identify UBOs. 

  • Human Resources for Data Analysis:

Even with advanced data sources, human intervention is necessary to verify and analyze the data. Skilled compliance professionals are needed to sift through the information, verify its accuracy, and extract relevant details. This hybrid of tech and human expertise is crucial for effective compliance.

  • Understanding the Full Supply Chain:

Extending due diligence beyond immediate customers to include their customers and supply chains is important. This broader perspective helps identify risks that might not be apparent when only considering direct customers, ensuring comprehensive compliance.

  • Implementation of a Risk-Based Approach:

Adopting a risk-based approach to compliance is essential. This involves conducting initial risk assessments to determine the level of due diligence required for different customers or third parties. By focusing on the specific risks associated with each entity, resources can be allocated more effectively, enhancing compliance efforts.

  • Balancing Data Quantity and Quality:

It’s crucial to manage the balance between having too much and too little data. Overloading data can lead to analysis paralysis, while insufficient data can result in poor decision-making. The key is to efficiently use technology to filter and highlight the most relevant data for compliance purposes.

  • Focus on Regulatory Compliance and Risk Management:

Ensuring that compliance efforts are not just for satisfying regulators but are also geared towards understanding and mitigating financial crime risks. This dual focus ensures that compliance strategies are robust and effective in addressing the actual risks posed by various entities in the business ecosystem.

The Bottom Line:

Many firms still rely heavily on curated data sets for compliance in today’s complex regulatory landscape. Access to live corporate registry data and solution providers is increasingly essential. That’s where The KYB (Know Your Business) comes at the forefront, bringing this critical data directly to compliance analysts. The KYB enhances the compliance toolkit by providing real-time access to corporate registry information, which is vital for verifying the Ultimate Beneficial Owner and identifying any significant changes in ownership.

With its extensive global business database, The KYB is a powerful solution for firms aiming to enhance their compliance processes. By integrating live corporate registry data, we equip businesses and compliance professionals with the necessary means to stay ahead of evolving regulatory challenges and effectively manage financial crime risks.

Get in touch with experts at The KYB today!

How to Collect & Verify Beneficial Owner’s Information for Compliance

Companies must verify the partner’s business and its owners to comply with worldwide regulations such as Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CFT). To do so, they have to collect beneficial owners’ information and verify this through screening against government and third-party databases. Verification of the entity indicates that they are onboarding legitimate businesses and meeting rigid regulations. 

Unfortunately, it is not as simple as it looks. Many bogus companies use complex ownership structures to launder money, and that’s why 2- 5% of the global GDP is laundered. They registered the company in a complex ownership structure to hide their ultimate beneficial owners, such as LLCs, which makes it challenging to find the actual owners. Beyond small businesses, giant corporations have a more complex ownership structure, from national to international companies. You have to verify all owners and uncover the disguised identity. 

Why is Beneficial Owners’ Information Significant? 

Transparency before onboarding the company is compulsory for businesses to prevent financial scams and secure the dignity of the global economy. From 2024, the US Department of Financial Crimes Enforcement (FinCEN) will make it compulsory for small businesses to report beneficial ownership information (BOI). After that, other countries are also designing new regulations to comply with BOI reporting. Non-compliance caused companies to be fined deftly and subjected to civil penalties. 

Some companies expand the UBO structure to hire the person and owners in line with the other jobs, for example, CTO, CFO, or CEO. This assists them to hide their identity while working in the company. So these loopholes or scammer techniques make it compulsory for companies to authenticate the beneficial ownership information. 

What is the BOI Reporting Rule?

Beneficial ownership is individually owning the company or the actual funding source. Companies can be Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs) of the business who have 10-25% shares. They control the business decisions and have the right to vote.  The AML ordinance defines a beneficial owner as a person who: 

  • Owns 10-25% of the company shares (Depending on the location)
  • Has the right to make decisions and vote against the business strategies 
  • Has significant control over the business  

Now finding the information about all these persons and verifying known as beneficial owners information reporting. Always remember to find the actual owner and attest their documents. The managers, CEO, or UBO are not actual funders of the company. 

How to Collect Beneficial Owner’s Information? 

The business owner’s information should be available in the company if established by one person, family, or different parties. The transparent corporate structure defines all the entities that own the business by address, contact, name, or role. Nevertheless, most companies work on the LLC structure, where owners hide behind the curtain. 

Ways to Collect the business owners’ data

Manual 

Companies mainly working with other businesses (B2B) can ask their partner representatives to submit their owner’s information. In this data, they must collect government IDs, financial statements, addresses, contacts, etc, depending on the country or sector policies. 

Automate 

Using technology to remote document collection, you can design the form for the customer according to regulations and sector policies. This assists them in only reaping information from the business, which is essential, and doesn’t waste time on irrelevant papers.

Beneficial Owners Information Reporting

How to Verify Beneficial Owners Information? 

For beneficial ownership information reporting, there are various checks from which you have to verify the collected data. These derivatives are compulsory to ensure the submitted information is legal and not counterfeit. Below are KYB checks you can follow to verify the beneficial owner’s information: 

Create a Profile 

After collecting the information, you have to store company data in a secured database to create a profile according to their information. It assists you in verifying the information of their ultimate owners. For profile creation, gather the addresses, names, government IDs, registration licenses, etc. 

Attest the Profile 

Information attestation is essential for the company to comply with the KYB measures. It can be done by checking the security features of the documents. These security features can vary according to the papers. Fonts, signatures, and borders are the main security features for document verification. 

Valid the profile 

The information collected from the business owners must be valid. For that, the company should cross-check the written document of the papers, which is done by cross-checking data from the original papers. It ensures the data is valid and not counterfeited to use for bad practice. 

Screen the Profile 

Various databases indicate whether the company was involved in illicit activities or not. These databases can be government or third-party. The onboarding company screens the business ownership information against these databases to ensure their information does not match any of these. PEPs, AML, CFT, and SIEs are the primary databases used in this process.  

Centralized a profile 

Companies must monitor their partner ownership structure after verification to comply with KYB regulations. Perpetual KYB monitoring can indicate any changes in the ownership structure and reveal suspicious trades that occurred by the company or its UBOs. 

Industries of Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements

All companies under the AML/CFT regulations must report beneficial ownership information. Although each type of industry has different rules and policies to verify the business to avoid non-compliance penalties, they have to uphold requirements. However, according to FinCEN, companies with LLC sectors or UBOs must report their beneficial owners. Below are some primary sectors: 

  • Financial Institutes 
  • Medical Insurance 
  • Crypto Wallets 
  • Real Estate 
  • Asset Protection
  • Banks  

Additionally, the individual business owner has to report beneficial owners’ information as a small business. The beneficial owners’ report should include their name, address, and nationality. The report should also describe the nature and extent of the owner’s interest in the business.

Automate Beneficial Owner’s Information 

The adequate technique to verify the business with enhanced due diligence and visualized reports of beneficial owners is The KYB. With the 250+ primary databases, we provide accurate and authentic results. Moreover, meet global compliance to avoid penalties and expand your business. The KYB also ensures the screening by quickly cross-checking the data from PEPs, sanctions lists, legal filings, adverse media as well AML/CFT databases to ensure the company and its owners are not involved in illicit activities. 

The KYB stored results in the centralized reports, which business owners can use to monitor ownership structure changes. Additionally, instant and accurate verification through the KYB saves time and money for the company. For a detailed overview, Talk to The KYB Expert!

The Comprehensive Guide to Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO)

The financial industry is highly regulated, ranking among the world’s most strictly governed fields. The same level of oversight is applied to the financial dealings of multinational firms. Several pieces of anti-money-laundering legislation have been passed in recent years, increasing the difficulty of maintaining regulatory compliance in the financial sector. Authorities in many countries have been brainstorming new strategies to combat the global expansion of money laundering. 

Government agencies learned the hard way that the absence of beneficial ownership transparency was a gap in the existing due diligence mechanism after the Panama Papers Leak. Lack of transparency over beneficial ownership was a significant issue that enabled criminals to launder money through offshore accounts. 

In 2016, regulators began pushing back with new laws regarding UBOs and companies’ disclosure of related data. It is essential, not just to adhere to FinCEN requirements, to determine who the genuine Ultimate Beneficial Owner is. Without UBO checks, an organization could be linked to money laundering and terrorist financing, just like Singapore-based DBS Bank Limited. They were accused of not taking anti-money-laundering measures sufficiently. The firm was charged a $25,000,000 penalty for other alleged financial wrongdoings. Now, proper due diligence is crucial more than ever. 

What is UBO?

A corporation’s Ultimate Beneficial Owner is the person or entity with the company’s most significant direct or indirect financial interest. This person is the ultimate beneficiary of the company’s actions, even if they do not have hands-on management responsibilities. Compliance with anti-money-laundering (AML) legislation and limiting the risk of financial crimes depend on knowing who the Ultimate Beneficial Owner is. 

As defined by the Financial Action Task Force, “UBO is the natural person who ultimately owns or controls a customer and the natural person on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted.“. It also includes people with ultimate effective control over a legal entity or arrangement, as limited by FATF’s beneficial owner rules.

  • Individuals who hold at least 25% of the company’s shares; 
  • Individuals who account for at least 25% of the vote,
  • Investors who receive at least 25% of a company’s profits, 
  • Authorized representatives, 
  • Guardian of minors,
  • A company’s owners might be hidden from public view by appointing corporate or nominee directors.

Importance of UBO 

Those subject to regulation must have complete confidence in the parties they deal with. Validating the real identities of legal people is essential to regulatory compliance, whether clients or business partners. It also helps prevent monetary loss and safeguards the company’s reputation.

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime states that more than $2 trillion is made illegally yearly. If a company’s UBOs are exposed, they may try to cancel their identities to avoid legal ramifications rather than admit to engaging in criminal activities. By remaining anonymous, criminals can engage in activities like tax evasion, money laundering, embezzlement, and corruption. Disclosure of beneficial owners enhances the financial system’s safety and openness.

The Difference Between Beneficial Ownership and Legal Ownership

Beneficial ownership and legal ownership diverge in the realm of rights and control over assets. Legal ownership stands as the official recognition of ownership, granting legal rights and obligations. In contrast, beneficial ownership encompasses the actual perks derived from an asset, such as profits and decision-making authority. While legal ownership is on paper, beneficial ownership underscores tangible benefits. This contrast holds weight in trading, anonymity, concealing assets, tax avoidance, influencing transparency, and accountability.

Some of the reasons why beneficial and legal ownership are different are as follows:

Trading

For security and convenience reasons, many people who possess securities prefer to trade them under their broker’s name. This practice is legitimate and frequent in the banking industry. 

Anonymity

Some people conceal their true identity by registering their assets under someone else’s name for security and privacy reasons. Famous people, politicians, and others who don’t want their home address made public could re-title their property in someone else’s name. There is no law against this.

Concealing Assets

Some people have assets registered differently to avoid losing property after a divorce or lawsuit. Financial fraud, including the use of beneficial ownership, is prohibited.

Tax Avoidance

Some individuals and businesses prefer to split ownership of their assets among several names to reduce their taxable income. Using beneficial ownership in this way is prohibited since it is used to avoid paying taxes.

Money Laundering

Money laundering hides the genuine ownership of assets and the origin of funds gained illegally. The Ultimate Beneficial Owner of illicitly acquired assets may be concealed, or their involvement with money laundering may be hidden by having those assets registered in another legal owner’s name. Terrorist groups might also benefit from money launderers. Both individuals who engage in money laundering and those who help it by failing to enforce internal anti-laundering policies face legal consequences.

How to Identify The UBO?

The UBO must be located through a series of steps that may include:

  • Understanding the business structure: To start, learn everything about who owns and runs the company, directly as well as indirectly. 
  • Analyzing the supporting paperwork: For clues as to who the UBO is, look at shareholder agreements, trust deeds, and partnership contracts. These records may reveal essential facts regarding the company’s management and ownership.
  • Performing due diligence: Investigate the business, its owners, and any associated parties to spot warning signs that could lead to further scrutiny.
  • Tracing the ownership chain: Find out who controls the company by following the money trace. For this purpose, reviewing trust deeds, share registers, and other legal documents is necessary.
  • UBO Authentication: Once the UBO has been located, their ownership stake and identification must be confirmed using external resources such as public documents and databases. It is critical to follow these procedures precisely to get the right Ultimate Beneficial Owner.

Influencing Factors on Compliance

Some recent developments that may impact the organization’s compliance and risk management are:

Russia-Ukraine conflict: In 2023, the war will likely continue as before. Sanctions avoidance tactics led to stricter oversight in the United States and Europe. Firms must revise risk management and due diligence procedures for business with Russian clients or suppliers.

Production-side supply-chain elements: Due to political changes, manufacturing supply chains have relocated to other nations, often through local alliances. Check the beneficial ownership of any foreign partnerships with foreign legal persons.

Cryptocurrencies: The OECD unified a reporting standard for crypto-assets, including beneficial ownership reporting, to narrow tax avoidance gaps.

Be wary if a business or a client of yours operates in an industry affected by the following:

  • Energy sources and petroleum-based goods
  • Wheat farming and industry
  • Processing of metals, including iron, aluminium, and copper
  • Appliances and electronics
  • Corporations dealing with money, such as banks
  • Services related to money and finance, such as insurance and investment advice
  • Digital currency services

Read more: How to Collect & Verify Beneficial Owner’s Information for Compliance

UBO Reporting Requirement 

Businesses are required by law in many countries to disclose details about their UBOs to the appropriate authorities. The rules and regulations in a region may call for different reports. Among the most often seen report formats are:

Creating a Centralized Registry for UBO Data

UBO data must be registered with a government agency in some regions. This may make it simpler for authorities to detect and keep tabs on UBOs, increasing transparency.

Regulatory Filings and Annual Reports with UBO Information

UBO data may be required for various industries’ annual reports and regulatory filings. The ownership structure of a corporation will always be up to date if this is done.

The Sharing of UBO Data with Banks and Other Businesses

As part of due diligence, firms may need to reveal UBO information to banks or other companies. By doing so, firms can avoid unknowingly helping in committing financial crimes or conducting business with potentially dangerous individuals or organizations. Knowing and following the reporting regulations relevant to the company and legal system is paramount.

Challenges to Identifying and Verifying UBOs 

Several obstacles must be overcome, which adds extra work and time to discovering and certifying a UBO. Among these challenges are:

Complex Ownership Structures 

A company may have several layers of ownership or control. Because of the complexity of the company’s ownership structure and the relationships between the many organizations, identifying the Ultimate Beneficial Owner can be challenging.

Lack of Transparency 

It might be challenging to get up-to-date information on a company’s UBO because of lax laws in some jurisdictions. The need for clarity may hamper the identifying and verifying procedure.

Shareholders and Directors Up for Election

Identifying the UBO can be even more difficult for nominee directors and shareholders. When these middlemen are selected to work on behalf of the UBO, it becomes more complicated to determine who the actual owner is.

Restricted Access to Data

A company’s UBO data is not readily available or is held by a third party. This can make collecting the data needed to identify and verify the UBO appropriately challenging.

Despite these obstacles, businesses must identify and validate the UBO; otherwise, the company could face severe legal and financial repercussions.

Step-by-Step Ultimate Beneficial Owner

Each country where a firm operates has its regulations that must be followed. However, several consistent steps must be taken to create an effective UBO program strategically.

  • Check The Company’s References

Company information like name, address, legal standing, key personnel, and verification of record correctness must be provided.

  • Determine Who Owns What and How Much

Knowing who owns shares in the company and how they are invested is essential.

  • Identify Beneficial Owners

Businesses can spot a UBO by calculating the overall percentage of shares, ownership stake, as well as managerial control held by the entity or natural person in question and then checking to see if any of those factors bring them under the purview of a UBO.

  • All UBOs Should be Subjected to AML/KYC Checks

The procedure of conducting UBO checks can be simplified, making it easy for compliance and legal departments. The onboarding process is lengthened due to the inefficiency of manual data screening. Re-screening and re-evaluation due to human error increases the time it takes to launch a company. In addition, employees need help with data entry rather than resolving sophisticated compliance issues.

UBO Law and Regulations 

EU UBO Requirements 

UBOs must be identified by EU financial institutions dealing with commercial clients. The 4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (4AMLD) in the European Union was the first to mandate UBO identification, and other member states have since introduced enabling laws to enforce reporting obligations. For instance, the beneficial owners must be disclosed to Sweden’s Swedish Companies Registration Office. By Swedish law:

  • This applies to Swedish entities, foreign businesses in Sweden, and those who manage trusts and similar legal arrangements.
  • Beneficial owners can exercise majority voting authority over the board of directors or more than a 25% ownership share in the company.
  • Prescribes the reporting of any change in beneficial ownership as soon as the entity is made aware of the alteration in ownership.

Each EU member state has its laws; however, they must follow the 4AMLD. The 5th AML Directive mandated that member nations make registers of businesses, trusts, and other legal arrangements available to the public. 

EU’s 6th AML Directives expand the scope of criminal liability to include employees and officials of organizations as well as entities acting on their behalf. 

US UBO Requirements 

To ensure the same beneficial ownership disclosures are made in the United States, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) released the Customer Due Diligence final regulation on May 11, 2018.

FinCEN’s rule guidance states, “The CDD Rule establishes a new duty for certain banks, with certain caveats and exemptions: determining and confirming the identities of customers operating as legal entities.” 

Financial institutions are broadly defined in the rule to encompass such entities as futures commission merchants, commodity brokers, and mutual funds. Companies, partnerships, and business trusts are all legal entities that can be customers. According to the regulation, “beneficial owner” refers to those who own at least 25% of a company’s voting stock as well as have significant control over its management and daily operations. 

US businesses are required by the Corporate Transparency Act to provide FinCEN with the entire legal name, date of birth, current address, and identification number of the UBO.

International UBO Standards 

Disclosure of beneficial ownership is required under international agreements with other governments. Standards for beneficial ownership were first established in 2003 by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and in 2012, 198 governments agreed to adopt FATF guidelines. Two years later, at the G20 Brisbane Summit, a policy declaration highlighted UBO’s openness.

The declaration stated, “Legal entities’ beneficial ownership information should be readily available to government agencies (such as those in charge of law enforcement and prosecution, supervision, taxation, and financial intelligence) in a timely manner.”

According to a FATF assessment in 2016, only two of the G20 had substantially effective beneficial ownership regulations. While the FATF is committed to ensuring effective Beneficial Ownership transparency regulations are in place, it acknowledges its difficulty. A solution may be found using technologies and methods that expedite as well as enhance the process’s precision.

UBO Database and Technology Solution

Ultimate Beneficial Owners can be found with the help of several databases and technologies. Incorporating these ideas into an automated system helps speed up and improve the accuracy of the identification procedure. Examples of common approaches include: 

UBO Information Repositories

These databases collect information about UBOs from various sources, including business registrations and government documents. These databases are helpful since they make identifying the Ultimate Beneficial Owner easier and provide more details about them. 

KYC and AML Solutions 

Due diligence may be automated with KYC and AML systems, as can the identification and verification of UBOs. These solutions can also lessen the likelihood of financial crimes and help organizations comply with applicable legislation. 

Blockchain Technology

Blockchain technology may provide legally binding and verifiable property records. It can help firms keep track of UBOs by ensuring that ownership records are always up-to-date. It is crucial to find the correct technological answer for a company and ensure it abides by the necessary rules. 

UBO in Different Industries 

Identifying Ultimate Beneficial Owners is crucial in several sectors, including real estate, banking, and finance. With a better grasp of who gains from a transaction, financial crimes like money laundering can be avoided, and reputational harm can be avoided. 

Investigating potential partners or investors in these sectors is critical to verify they align with UBO rules and regulations.

Conclusion 

Identifying UBOs is essential for maintaining openness, controlling risks, and meeting legal requirements. Businesses can lessen the likelihood of financial crimes, reputational damage, and monetary implications by learning who the Ultimate Beneficiary is. 

To guarantee Ultimate Beneficial Ownership laws and regulations verify the company, businesses must follow best practices, interact with regulators, and implement the required technological solutions. 

However, ‘The KYB’ offers advanced UBO verification to identify actual beneficial owners in real-time, ensuring regulatory compliance. Expedite UBO verification, simplify ownership insights, and adhere effortlessly to regulations. Uncover ownership percentages, discern significant control, and trace direct/indirect ownership. Explore entity relationships, and gain vital insights for ownership comprehension. Verify fund legitimacy, screen UBOs against global sanctions, visualize ownership structure for informed decisions, streamline due diligence, meet AML compliance, and mitigate risks. Elevate business operations with The KYB’s comprehensive solution.

More Posts